Anny Advice to Homeowners when HOA board starts making up rules & procedures?

(this post is actually related to my original Post "Backetball Hoopla..." I felt it deserves a post of its own.)

I would like advice from other homeowners who have tried (and ideally, been successful) stopping their HOA baords from simply "making up" rules, interpretations, etc. during board meetings and hearings that simply don't exist in the CCRs, bylawas and ammendments. I've been in corp. business for 21 years, negotiating & interpreting contracts for about 15 of those years, and NEVER have I seen such blatent "personal interpretation" of an otherwise 1-sided contract called the CCRs(favoring the HOA)!

At our hearing this past week, our board had pulled these 'stunts' in leiu of pointing to any written rules regarding hearings, surveys, etc.
1. at our violation hearings, they stated we each had 5 minutes to plead our case & a timer was set, but failed to Show where in the documentation (CCRs, bylaws, ammendments)the "5 minute timer rule" (5 minutes for a homeowner to plead their case) was written & approved.
2. They threw-out and called "illegal" a signed petition to rescind their recent "rule" (see below): We surveyed the neighborhood (72% of homes polled) and proved that 77% of owners were in favor of rescinding the rule AND allowing kids to have basketball goals & play with sports equipment in front of their homes (on the street). As I prsented this data, I was told "there is a procedure for rescinding a rule, and a petition is not it." by one board memeber but they could not point to it in any documentation.
3.In a letter to all homwoners prior to 6 families petitioing the neighborhood, we quaoted the board president (in the prior board meeting) on the # of persons that had complaied about the boackboards (11 persons from 134 homes in the past year). When I was called-in for my heaing he claimed that "I had illegally used his personal information".
4.They argued that they had a right to review ALL correspondance to homeowners,a right to review and change wording about anything being sent to the homes. However, again, there's nothing documented in this regard. In the prior baord meeting, we did have a discussion about how to get a section of the CCRs changed (2/3 approval of all homeowners, which is documented in the CCRs) AND at that time they added "we have a right to review and approve the new wording before a vote is taken" (not in the CCRs!).

In comparison to a corporate contract, our CCRs are so poorley written, they couldn't be used in buiness to effectively negotiate anything without a severe overhaul.

Background
Our board this past week held "homeowner vs. board" 5 minute hearings for 5 of 6 of us who are in voilation of their new "No sports equipment in front of the house, Only in the Back yard" (yes, they BANNED ALL kids play equipment from the front of the house: skaeboards, skate ramps,basketball hoops, EVERYTHING, claiming the needed to make a rule that enforced this section of our CCRs: "9.4: No basketball baackbaords of any kind shall be erected or attached, by permanent or temporary method to any dwelling unit unless approved by the architectual control committee."

Practice of the past arch. committee has been to coerce homeowners to put backboards only in their back yards. When the new ach. committee found a few in front of our houses (freestanding portabales) guess what? - we were surpired eith the new rule (above), violation notices & hearings!


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I'd get out of your

I'd get out of your community that's crazy!


The fact that you have come

The fact that you have come face to face with the true nature of what an HOA is has surprised you. I can empathize with that. There is one point that you make however that is in complete error. HOA CC&Rs are corporate contracts with the force of law behind them. The CID Industry has seen to that.

Most people upon learning what you have learned at first cannot believe it. They are still functioning under the naive notion that they have "property rights". Nothing could be further from the truth. You have no more rights than a shareholder of General Motors.

While the virtually incomprehensible state statues which control HOAs sometimes allege to promise the idea of balance in a community's governance, the truth is that there is always a method available to allow draconian control of the neighborhood.

The petty personal behavior that is the result of neighbor ruling over neighbor, or the "Fatal Flaw" as I call it, inevitably comes into play in these resident vs board confrontations, regardless of how trivial the matter at hand may be. The type of person who craves a board position is usually a self-aggrandizing busybody who's primary goal is to play the role assigned to him/her by the CID industry. Frustrated in life, they flex their ego through the legal fiction of a "fiduciary responsibility" to the HOA, at the expense of everyone around them. Furthermore, there is a vast infrastructure to champion them in this cause.

The thing you must understand is that this is mostly a psychological battle. The people who benefit from the $50,000,000,000.00 per year that go into HOA coffers realize that the residents have to be made to feel powerless, otherwise they may become enlightened as to the scam being played on them, and defect from the fold, thus derailing the "HOA Gravy Train".

My advice is simple. If possible convince your neighbors to abolish the HOA. If this is not feasible, then see if you can abolish all the rules. HOAs are a fatally flawed concept that cannot be fixed. They can only be done away with.


Thanks. I certainly

Thanks. I certainly understand that this is a corporate contract (all be it pretty one-sided). While I agree that abolishing the rules or (better) abolishing the board is the best solution, going back to the sparse CCRs & Bylaws, there's no process documentation that we as homeowners can point to (in the CCRs or By laws) to do that. I'd love a 'abolish and start over' clause in CCRs protecting homeowners when a boards gets too full of themselves. Voting competent memebers in to gain control can take years as our terms are staggered.

How do we insure that the execution of "undoing" rules or abolishing the board is not disrrupted by more "made-up" rules to block the activity?

At best, I think we can only change the CCR section that allows them to make a rule at will, that is, IF we can secure a 2/3 vote of all homeowwners AND manuver around their thinking that they have the right to "approve the wording of the CCR change being voted".

To me it sems that the only way to abolish this 'control' is to prove their statements 'null and void' under Az contract law, which I think would require the dillegence and background of a good real estate / contract attorney to fight. Every time I ask for documentation to substantiate their actions, I simply get a cold stare!


Post new comment

  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <b> <strong> <strike> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <i>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.
  • Easily link to terms in various wikis. For help, see interwiki.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
Captcha Image: you will need to recognize the text in it.
Please type in the letters/numbers that are shown in the image above.